As I've said many times before, the problem with leaving the radio on while I work is that occasionally it makes me angry. (The problem with leaving the radio off, on the other hand, is that I get restless when it's too quiet and I can't get any work done.)
Today the problem was a News Hour essay by Richard Rodriguez. The text isn't online yet, so I'm forced to reconstruct from memory, but I'm pretty sure that the phrase "Mexicans are our conscience" was involved somewhere.
The larger point, which is probably one worth making, is that there's something very complicated and a little messed up about this country's relationship to undocumented Mexican immigrants. That's fine. I could have done without the kind of floofy-patronizing-liberal statements about Mexicans and my conscience, but whatever. I'm not sure what a better way of getting at the point would have been.
What really got me, though, was the big finish, a series of dramatic statements about how the situation of undocumented Mexican workers should lead all of us to question the motivations of our own immigrant ancestors, who (as I believe he put it) may have been more interested in manufacturing jobs than in the Federalist Papers. Maybe, he says, maybe, and I know it's shocking to consider, but maybe past generations of immigrants also were looking for work. Just like the current ones!
So my question is, is this a case where I'm really out of touch with what most people think on this issue, or is this a case where an NPR/PBS commentator states something really obvious as though it were shocking because he or she can't imagine that the audience isn't stupid? Because they do that too sometimes.
I mean, I know that I've studied American history in a little more depth than your average American, but that's not where I get this particular knowledge from. I get this knowledge from my family. We've got all of the stories about why Great-Grandma Anna or Grandma and Grandpa Carini came to the United States, and not a one of them has to do with political freedoms or lofty ideals. They were poor in their home countries, and they thought they might not be poor in America. It's always seemed pretty straightforward to me.
Posted by Susan at March 16, 2004 07:47 PMYes, yes, stupid commentator.
Posted by: Bondgirl at March 16, 2004 09:50 PMThe old saying, after all, was that in America, the streets are paved with gold--not that in America, you're free to walk on them.
(Certainly plenty of people and groups have come here seeking freedom of one sort or another, or escaping persecution. But economic immigration has been here as long as immigration itself--compare Jamestown to Plymouth.)
Posted by: Dave at March 20, 2004 11:12 AMI have found the best online pharmacy to buy
Generic Viagra online
generic Cialis
generic Lipitor
Buy Viagra
Posted by: viagra at September 22, 2004 12:09 PMBuy Cialis
Posted by: cialis at September 22, 2004 12:59 PMBuy Cialis
Posted by: cialis at September 23, 2004 06:40 PMFast cash advance loan and pay day online loans. Information about Florida payday loans, California fast payday loan advances, and Texas short term loans.
Posted by: payday loans at October 3, 2004 03:29 PMI am not one of those who think that the people are never in the wrong. They have been so, frequently and outrageously, both in other countries and in this. But I do say, that in all disputes between them and their rulers, the presumption is at least upon a par in favour of the people.
Posted by: vimax extender at October 7, 2004 02:55 PMAwesome sentiment! I totally agree with you!
Posted by: fleshlight at October 12, 2004 11:19 AMThere can be no other truth to take off from than this: I think, therefore, I exist. There we have the absolute truth of consciousness becoming aware of itself.
Posted by: penis enlargement at October 15, 2004 05:06 AMThere is no great genius without some touch of madness.
Posted by: penis enlargement at October 15, 2004 05:09 AM